The question above anticipates the Legal brief that you may access here (or below) because there might be some who feel that attaching support to a legal suit against UTLA is not advocacy. I'd like to suggest that among the ways that we can advocate for meaningful change is to be agitational. In the parlance of community organizing, that means making waves, provoking a response, and exercising legal means as well as public pressure to drive change. This lawsuit, managed on a pro-bono basis by our Temple member Jeremy Rosen, seeks to do just that. It challenges seniority rules that force schools in minority communities that are already under-served to lay off their effective teachers because they might have lower seniority than other teachers in the entire LAUSD system.
Though it only affects about 50 schools we (who are listed as amici curiae) believe that though layoffs place a harsh burden on teachers (and we deeply regret that burden) concern for the well-being of teachers cannot be the only factor driving decision about who is laid off. Because the teachers with the least seniority are often placed in the most troubled schools, they are often the first to go. This creates a high teacher attrition rate in schools where consistency is sorely needed. Why should these children bear the burden of failed educational policies?
Ultimately, major changes must occur in LAUSD as well as the educational system in California. There are many organizations working for those changes as well as advocates seeking to pressure the legislature, the school districts and the teachers' unions to make those changes. Some of the ideas are good, some are less so. However, without pressure nothing will change.
You will notice that the list of amici curiae draws from across the political spectrum. Thus we feel that our support is in keeping with our commitment to non-partisanship and yet, makes as strong statement about the need for serious reform.
In addition, in some of his conversations with Educational Advocates,
LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy indicated that sometimes, suits are the
best avenue to affect change in a moribund system overburdened with
arcane and obsolete legislative restrictions.
The majority of members of our Stephen S. Wise Temple Educational Advocacy group signed on to this law suit to add our names to those who are pressuring the system to change. We hope that joined by the voices and actions of many in our state, the officials and leaders whose decisions influence the quality of public education will ultimately make the necessary to improve our schools.
2012-03-01 ACB Reed v. United Teachers [HL]